Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Vieux Carré's avatar

I just want to comment that so many replies to this start with quotations from the actual text, followed by reasoned commentary. How about that for an internet comment section? It speaks to the quality of your audience, Sarah! (Not to sound too SELF congratulatory)

Expand full comment
miles.mcstylez's avatar

The one wildcard in all this is the Tucker Carlson effect.

My city had a similar blowup where Muslim students skipped class on a #Pride day, and their teacher got caught on a hot mic berating them. See https://nationalpost.com/opinion/rahim-mohamed-unhinged-teacher-tells-muslim-to-support-pride-or-you-cant-be-canadian

It's tough for woke media outlets to bury these kinds of stories entirely when they see the ratings of a guy like Tucker, who will broadcast stories like this one (if not this exact one) to a massive audience that skews surprisingly bipartisan. Burying the existence of, say, socially conservative Muslims, only works if your audience is in such a news bubble that if they don't hear about it from you, they won't hear about it at all.

It's sort of like how the NYT had to (reluctantly!) acknowledge recent European trends on gender-affirming care for minors, because they knew their audience was bound to hear about it one way or another: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/09/health/puberty-blockers-transgender-children-britain-nhs.html

So I'm not sure the MINOs are actually going to be able to hog the mic (we all know they'll try) simply because woke outlets are under increasing pressure to address the elephant in the room in order to salvage what's left of their credibility, and by extension their ratings.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts